View Single Post
  #16  
Old 25-05-2015, 05:34 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
I have a copy of this lens and frankly was never really happy with the CA.

Canon Australia kindly tested it for me, and the report came back that it was in fact an *excellent* copy.

From a photographers point of view I can say it ticks a lot of boxes...but from an astrophotography point of view...forget it at F1.2!

...edge coma and lateral colour abounds....given the money...it's a shocker.

At F2.8 it tightens up a lot....begging the question " so many $$$ for a F2.8??"

Bang for buck is Sigma's new 12-24mm zoom. Seems designed for Astro!

Bugger all lateral colour. Low coma...and extraordinary value for money.
(...OK I'm a lucky guy and have one of these as well)....but watch this space...I've just ordered Canon's new L-series 11-24mm...not a typo...that's ELEVEN-to-24mm.

Early reviews are simply gushing in praise.... we shall see!
Ive got the Canon EIGHT-15mm L f4 . You get 180 deg round pics with that (at 8mm), not really mid field, but really interesting for out-there TL.
Also 24mm f1.4 L which I was told when I bought it a while back was the duck guts for Astro, but sadly it suffers seagulls around the edges.
Reply With Quote