View Single Post
  #11  
Old 12-11-2018, 06:07 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,984
The deepest I’ve managed yet is low SNR at Mag 22 with 8” and dark skies in about 4 hours if luminance. That was at 1.3”/pixel. If I was to image at 2.6”/pixel it wouldn’t make much difference for a star because I was already well sampled but it would help with non-point light sources.

Capturing the same amount of photons would take 1 hour with a 16” or just under 30 minutes with a 24” or about 10 minutes with a 1m telescope.

The depth that can be achieved on dusty regions and the like can in some ways be less aperture related and more a function of aperture area and resolution. This is what makes the FSQ106 and KAF-16803 such a powerful instrument combination as Mike can attest to. Large pixels and F/5 sucks up photons and makes capturing fainter dust a breeze.
Reply With Quote