View Single Post
  #19  
Old 17-08-2018, 09:36 PM
miki63au's Avatar
miki63au
Registered User

miki63au is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkArts View Post
The G11 limit is accurate and applicable to astrophotography - no 'rule of thumb' reduction needed. I run a C14 on a G11 without problems (although I did upgrade to high torque motors, not that I really needed them). At one point, Celestron sold the two together as a package called 'CG14' though that G11 mount allegedly had 'beefier' bearings according to some.

The G11 is a very well made/machined mount and Gemini 1 or 2 is very capable, but the handset might drive you crazy.



"but the handset might drive you crazy"

I do worry about that... too old for change...



The G11 is waaaay better than the CGEM-DX I used for the planets. My biggest issue is the the lack of one-piece-worm carrier with spring load and the issue of meridian tracking without an expensive motor replacement. I know this is can be addressed with $$$ ... and I do like tinkering... but need to get it for the right $$$


ps. is the extra bearings improve the max load and the new RA/DEC extension for pass Meridian tracking reduce the load capacity?


Cheers,
Mick
Reply With Quote