View Single Post
  #23  
Old 29-08-2012, 10:24 PM
Rex's Avatar
Rex
Registered User

Rex is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Townsville, Australia
Posts: 991
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
From memory I think the CLS CCD has an integrated UV and IR blocker where the plain CLS doesn't. For an unmodified DSLR use the plain CLS as the camera's stock filter already blocks UV/IR.
I have read that somewhere else as well and was thinking along the same lines, but on the Astronomic website it clearly says the cls-ccd is better for even unmodded dslr's and the plain cls is mainly for visual, so I am a little confused. On the links below scroll down to the suitability section on each page and have a read. It says that the cls is good for unmodded dslr's but the cls-ccd is very good for unmodded dslr's. Some input regarding this from some of you guys who actually use the filters would be great.
Thanks

http://www.astronomik.com/en/photogr...ls-filter.html

http://www.astronomik.com/en/photogr...cd-filter.html
Reply With Quote