View Single Post
  #2  
Old 21-09-2016, 10:24 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,709
Hi Leon

I have used the Mk II x1.4 Extender with the 400mm F5.6L and under good conditions, I have been very pleased with the results.

My experience has been that I have to very mindful of good technique and need good conditions to get reasonable results. With the 400mm F5.6L at its native focal length I am confident of getting a reasonable set of keepers, but when I fit the x1.4 Extender my keeper rate goes down. In my opinion, this is due more to environmental conditions (thermals, poor seeing, etc.) rather than the quality/sharpness/contrast of the combo itself.

On all occasions, the 400/x1.4 combo has produced better results than just up-sizing the naked 400mm in post.

On those occasions when I have used it for day time (distant) bird photography, the image quality is usually affected adversely by ground/air currents rather than the lens/extender combo itself.

Here is a selection of photos using this combo.

Cheers

Dennis.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Canon EOS 5D Mark III - IMG_4687 Crop 1024.jpg)
104.3 KB32 views
Click for full-size image (Canon EOS 5D Mark III - IMG_6424 FR 1024.jpg)
136.4 KB30 views
Click for full-size image (Canon EOS 5D Mark III - IMG_8927 Crop 1024.jpg)
148.0 KB27 views
Click for full-size image (Canon EOS 7D - IMG_3183 Crop 1024.jpg)
141.3 KB36 views
Click for full-size image (Moon Jupiter 7DMkII 400mm Ext1x4 Crop 1200.jpg)
102.5 KB36 views
Click for full-size image (Sea Eagle Landing Crop 1024.jpg)
149.0 KB26 views
Click for full-size image (Canon EOS 5D Mark III - IMG_3602 FR 800.jpg)
74.8 KB22 views
Click for full-size image (Canon EOS 5D Mark III - IMG_3602 Crop 800.jpg)
110.8 KB36 views
Reply With Quote