View Single Post
  #28  
Old 20-11-2013, 08:37 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Raymo, don't give up

Check these Deep Sky images out below .... and all taken with a DSLR!

Both guys were Astronomy Photographer of the Year 2013 finalists (top 5) in the Deep Space category, beating out imaging luminaries of the likes of Rob Gendler and Martin Pugh who use much more sophisticated equipment on both sides of the globe. Most of their images are better than most CCD images of the same subjects.

...so it can be done, it is all in the capturing and processing, a good scope helps too

Canon 1000D: http://www.pampaskies.com/gallery3/Deep-Space-Objects

Canon 5DMkII (& 30D): http://www.astroeder.com/deepsky/deepsky.htm

Good luck, you are never too old to learn

Mike
Dear Mike,
this image:
http://www.pampaskies.com/gallery3/D...s/Cent_A_rural

says " Camera: Canon 1000D (modded and peltier cooled) "

this image:
http://www.astroeder.com/m81-82_flux_eder_en.html
Modified camera
exposure time 309 x 5 min(24 hours 45 min total) @ ISO 1600


These are not standard DSLR cameras & in one case the huge amount of data is ridiculous.
Reply With Quote