Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN
Also, Sigma have a 70-200 f/2.8 which I've used side by side with my mates canon 70-200 f/2.8L and I honestly couldnt tell the difference in any way (physical, or image quality) apart from the fact that the sigma one was black and the canon L was white... at nearly $1000 less, I wonder... Whats in a name?
|
Yeah, agreed...
The sigma was a slightly more expensive option when I was looking for my lens and got great reviews. But, the Canon 70-200mm f4L was the best bang for buck lens at the time. I got mine for around $650, but have seen as-new ones going for around $550 on ebay!!
Doug