View Single Post
  #9  
Old 01-03-2015, 09:31 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,903
I have been looking this over myself a lot recently.

Roland Christen suggests 1 arc sec/pixel is a good guide for average seeing astrophotographers.

However I have had good results using a Trius 694 (4.54micron pixels) at 2 metres and that is .45 arc sec/pixel. It gives noticeably better resolution than a 9 micron CCD on galaxies.

With the KAF8300 and the 3 high QE Sony CCDs (ICX694 6.3 mp,814 9 mp,834 12mp) with super low read noise the equations seem to lean towards the smaller pixels for most applications except perhaps long focal lengths??

1.9 arc secs/pixel I would regard as undersampling by quite a bit. I agree with Rick here and it matches with my experience with CCDs in th elast few years.

But if you routinely get bad seeing then all bets are off.

Greg.
Reply With Quote