Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal
So it's not really 1/3 but 1/2.
Therefore I think any measurements Mike makes on his FITS files
will be considered reasonable and able to be trusted -
such as here:
https://pbase.com/strongmanmike2002/image/173195561
1.665 arc seconds seeing.
cheers
Allan |
I'm certainly no expert
but 1/2 is what I had heard too..? So it was making me think that my average FWHM of 1.5-1.7" with an image scale of 0.83"/pix was about right..
? but hey, I may be miss understanding, or confabulating two different concepts here ..somewhere
Mike