View Single Post
  #30  
Old 23-10-2013, 01:44 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,956
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz View Post
Hi Russell
Not knocking OSCs, they certainly have significant advantages. However, they do start out behind the 8 ball in sensitivity, since fewer than 1/3 of the photons falling on the chip actually make it through to the pixels - the rest are absorbed by the Bayer filters. For this reason, you will probably need to image a bit more than 3 times as long with an OSC to get the same luminance result as with an equivalent mono camera (luminance is synthesised in the case of the OSC). To add lower resolution colour data to the mono camera image, you will need to image maybe as long again (in RGB) as for luminance, so overall, the OSC will take about 1.5 times as long as an equivalent mono camera with LRGB filters for roughly the same result.

The situation is exacerbated if the OSC is uncooled, since thermal noise becomes a big issue if the signal levels are inherently low.
thanks for the info Ray thats very interesting, and something for people to consider in whether they are going OSC or mono w filters.
Reply With Quote