PDA

View Full Version here: : World’s Most Expensive Lens: $2 million Leica APO-Telyt-R 1600mm


Octane
28-08-2012, 01:00 PM
http://www.slrlounge.com/worlds-most-expensive-lens-leica-apo-telyt-r-1600mm

I'll take two, thanks; one for each eye.

H

Omaroo
28-08-2012, 01:12 PM
Yep - saw that doing the rounds the other day. It's actually the world's most expensive publicly-available lens - i.e. not some billion-dollar optic for NASA or defense. Some sheiks have way too much money. LOL

Vegeta
28-08-2012, 01:41 PM
WOA!!!, That thing's a Montser O.o

AstralTraveller
28-08-2012, 01:57 PM
It's only f/5.6. Couldn't they make something decent??? :shrug: :)

Octane
28-08-2012, 02:01 PM
David,

That was my first thought, too; f/2.8, or death. :P

H

Nico13
28-08-2012, 02:26 PM
That's a biggie alright, saw this one some time back though and it rates right up there at 256 Kg.
Keep in mind the camera hanging on the back is a Hasselblad

The design of the ZEISS Apo Sonnar T* 4/1700 required new lens assembly techniques and quality assurance methods never before applied in photo lens production – even by Carl Zeiss’ normally high standards. The finished lens weighs a staggering 256 kg (564 lbs.), placing unique demands on the focusing mechanisms. To address this issue, Carl Zeiss developed a totally new way of operating a telephoto lens, including servo controlled aiming and focusing systems like those used in large telescopes and similar instruments for astronomical scientists.

http://www.dpreview.com/news/2006/10/1/zeiss1700f4

troypiggo
28-08-2012, 02:44 PM
pffft. At f/5.6 you'd lose autofocus if you added a tele-extender to it.

strongmanmike
28-08-2012, 03:14 PM
Ah Yeh, now we're talking! A 17" F4 APO = awesome.... vs 11" F5.6 bah! :thumbsup:...imagine the tripod :eyepop:

Mike

gregbradley
28-08-2012, 03:20 PM
He could have gotten Tony Hallas's AP205 for $100K! It'd probably be better than the Leica anyway.

Greg.

AstralTraveller
28-08-2012, 03:43 PM
Perhaps the sheik got a 'special' price. ;)

FlashDrive
28-08-2012, 03:59 PM
Onyah H .... :rofl:

Barrykgerdes
28-08-2012, 04:04 PM
I had large zoom lens on my Image orthicon TV camera that would have cost about $10000 in the 1960's. That would have been the equivalent of around $250000 in today's money. Still a long way from $2M though.

Of course I did not pay that but Channel 9 probably did. I gave it to Channel 10 for their museum about 20 years ago.

Barry

Dennis
28-08-2012, 05:07 PM
Love the built in x1 finder in the handle.

Cheers

Dennis

Davi5678
28-08-2012, 05:49 PM
I want to see the 'Mercedes' tripod! :lol:

Terry B
28-08-2012, 08:13 PM
It works out as a 285mm (11.2") diameter APO refractor lens. An equivalent scope would be much cheaper. I think I'd rather the 11" refractor.

clive milne
28-08-2012, 09:31 PM
Being that a simple 12" paraboloid (with coma corrector) would provide essentially the same (or better) performance with a lot less hassle, this strikes me as just an exercise in stroking an over indulgent ego via brand image elitism.

Waxing_Gibbous
28-08-2012, 11:00 PM
Well...precisely.
Couldn't even get the AF to work at f5.6!!

Miaplacidus
28-08-2012, 11:07 PM
I think I'll just rest my camera on the INSIDE OF THE DEW SHIELD OF A 2 MILLION DOLLAR LENS!!!!!

Sheesh...

alocky
29-08-2012, 09:41 AM
Considering the most likely use of this lens will be wildlife photography, I'm glad the individual invested in photographic equipment. He could have easily spent the same dollars on an auto-ranging, wind compensating sight for a rifle so he could murder the things instead.
I wonder if he'll sell it cheap when he gets bored with it?
Cheers,
Andrew

lacad01
29-08-2012, 09:52 AM
Holy smoke! Expensive bit of glass, wouldn't want to drop it :P

Ric
29-08-2012, 01:07 PM
This might be a dumb question but what can you use it for?

04Stefan07
29-08-2012, 01:21 PM
That's crazy!

Omaroo
29-08-2012, 01:24 PM
AF? This isn't for Leicas. They're bought by photographers, not button-pushing think-we-are's. LOL ;)

Seriously, Leica cameras are manual focus. Always have been, probably always will be. It'll be interesting to see if the new M10 due out at Photokina keeps that alive or not.

Miaplacidus
29-08-2012, 02:57 PM
Well, probably it makes visible the owner's genitalia, but mainly it's used to impress.

Octane
29-08-2012, 04:04 PM
Ric,

Wildlife photography.

Think Planet Earth by BBC.

H

Omaroo
29-08-2012, 04:18 PM
And yeti hunting.

bloodhound31
29-08-2012, 11:45 PM
I love the comment, "This would be perfect for pictures of cats".

Ric
30-08-2012, 01:34 AM
Cheers H,

It's in perspective now, there was some amazing shots in those documentaries.