PDA

View Full Version here: : Amazing Photo ...


ZeroID
07-11-2011, 06:18 AM
Take a look at the third shot especially in this UK Daily Mail Article. Meteors and waterfall.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2058182/Photographer-Brad-Goldpaint-captures-amazing-images-Americas-remote-locations.html

Stunning bit of work.

DavidTrap
07-11-2011, 06:27 AM
Great shot, but why no star trails?

DT

iceman
07-11-2011, 06:40 AM
Beautiful images!


The waterfall would only need 10-20s exposure, and the static sky shot was probably using just one of his exposures.

The meteors would've been added in layers.

koputai
07-11-2011, 08:53 AM
Sorry, not my cup of tea, way too 'manufactured' looking.

What's with the second one? Star trails and stationary stars in the one image......yuck!

Cheers,
Jason.

traveller
07-11-2011, 09:23 AM
I am with you Jason, some people tend to think PS as a collage board rather than a digital developing tank.
Bo

Ric
07-11-2011, 10:45 AM
I like what he's done with the waterfall, very nice.

astroron
07-11-2011, 10:53 AM
Some wonderfull pictures there.
Just like artists the photographer has used the
tools at his disposal to make some great photographs :)
Cheers:thumbsup:

Baddad
07-11-2011, 11:07 AM
I like it.

Photographic Art.

Cheers

koputai
07-11-2011, 11:09 AM
Not having a go at you Ron, but do you think those sort of images can really be called 'photographs'?

Cheers,
Jason.

DavidTrap
07-11-2011, 11:37 AM
So has he "cut" the meteors out from the background stars and layered them in?

It looks great to those who are uneducated about the night sky, but knowing that there would have been movement of the stars during the time to capture all of those meteors makes it look a bit manufactured to me.

DT

iceman
07-11-2011, 11:39 AM
He could've had a tracking mount to capture the sky and meteors, as Phil Hart did recently (http://philhart.com/content/40-orionid-meteors-23rd-october-2011), and then layered on a fixed shot of the water falls.

DavidTrap
07-11-2011, 01:50 PM
That makes more sense.

ta
DT

bloodhound31
07-11-2011, 11:10 PM
The first one is lovely. The other two do nothing for me.

Poita
07-11-2011, 11:58 PM
Many of Frank Hurley's great photos were composites of multiple images and heavily processed in the darkroom. I don't see this as much different. Photographs have often been massively manipulated since the camera was invented.

As to whether you like the look or not, that is personal taste, I'm not sold on the shooting stars mixed with star trails, but it is still 'photography' as much as that done on film and manipulated in the darkroom is.

Octane
08-11-2011, 01:23 AM
The light on the mountaintop is what I live for.

Absolutely divine.

Though, the images do nothing for me, personally.

H

FlashDrive
08-11-2011, 05:04 PM
WOW ...aren't they terrific photos .... especially the Meteor Shower :thumbsup:

Flash :hi:

Jen
08-11-2011, 05:55 PM
:thumbsup: nice pics i like the waterfall one :thumbsup: wish i could do that LOL