View Full Version here: : Pictures in Sigs ?
29-09-2009, 09:07 AM
How about being allowed to link to a small image as a sig? if it was kept small, and linked to a photobucket or flickr image or something, then it shouldnt affect here too much, and it would help to brighten the place up?
just a thought
30-09-2009, 09:53 AM
30-09-2009, 09:54 AM
There was talk about this a while ago Duncan. I'll see if i can find the relevant thread.
30-09-2009, 09:58 AM
There is this one. see mikes first post re sigs and images
30-09-2009, 10:05 AM
also found this.
basically confirming that images in sigs is disabled.
30-09-2009, 10:26 AM
They're disabled for 2 reasons:
1. To reduce page load times, because people often link to off-site large images in their sigs
2. To reduce the clutter and put the emphasis on the post content, not huge blocks of signatures.
30-09-2009, 10:33 AM
Thats a fair, and logical answer Mike, thanks
30-09-2009, 11:02 AM
Nothing I dislike more than seeing sigs that are 10+ lines long or have large flashing graphics etc :)
01-10-2009, 05:24 AM
I remember the days when nobody had a sig, until that darn Robbery Beck fella invented the real estate section at the bottom, much to Ponders delight.
01-10-2009, 08:41 AM
How is that Robby Beck fella these days. He's been pretty quiet
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.