PDA

View Full Version here: : Extremely dark skies


andrewk_82
26-11-2008, 04:12 PM
I was just looking at this article http://www.skyandtelescope.com/resources/darksky/3304011.html?page=1&c=y at was wondering if anybody on this forum has experienced a class 1 dark sky as described in this article (limiting magnitude 7.6 - 8) :eyepop:. Even class 2 and 3 seem extremely good.

To me it sounds a bit like astronomical heaven and not like anything I've ever heard described before. If skys really get that dark I want to know where!!! :D

Cheers

Ian Robinson
26-11-2008, 04:23 PM
Yes - but I had no telescope with me as I was on 4x4 holiday in the Kimberleys and again a remote place in deserts areas of NT.

So how many visual stars (no telescope) can you count in the Plieades ?.... that's my measuring rod.

Best I can manage from my backyard is 10-12, under good skies 14-16.

Limit mag 7.5 would give 21.
Limit mag 7.8 would give 25.
Limit mag 6.5 would give 12.

See Guide V8 1degree centred on Pleiades.

Blue Skies
26-11-2008, 08:12 PM
Yes, I've experienced a night with a limiting mag of 7.6 I've never forgotten it. It was April/May and around 3am the Sagittarius region of the Milky Way was directly overhead. The dust lanes were black, compared to the background glow of the sky away from the star clouds and it looked like I could just reach up and pull the Milky Way apart to see what was beyond... Don't see nights like to often. :(

ausastronomer
26-11-2008, 09:39 PM
Hi Andrew,

I have experienced Bortle Class 2 skies on several occasions and they may well have been Bortle class 1. The most recent was in October 2007 at Coonabrabran when we experienced excellent conditions. I obtained regular repeatable readings of between 21.85 and 21.9 on my Unihedron Sky Quality Meter. M33 was visible naked eye. Keep in mind that when John Bortle talks about observing M33 with direct vision, he is in the Northern hemisphere observing it at the zenith. We are observing it at about 20 degrees elevation only and looking through a lot of murk down there. I have also experienced excellent skies on the West Coast of New Zealands South Island in the unpopulated areas up around Franz Joseph Glacier and down South near Doubtfull Sound. The only problem over there is you only get one clear night a month; and thats in a good month!

Cheers,
John B

astronut
27-11-2008, 09:40 AM
I experienced a sky between 1 & 2 last year at our Dark Sky site south of Berrima in N.S.W.
At 60 degrees above the Horizon, The Helix Nebula (Mag 7.1) was visible as a naked eye object, not nearly or maybe, Blind Freddie could have seen it.:lol:

andrewk_82
27-11-2008, 11:47 AM
There is hope for me yet then. I'm going camping next Thursday at a site about 450 kms from Brisbane and about 25kms from the nearest town that has a population of about 900 people. The closest large town is about 80kms away with a population of 12,000. I've been camping there quite a few times but not since I've been interested in astronomy, so I didn't really take much notice of the sky at night.

Helix Nebula naked eye, that would be awesome:eyepop:.

Omaroo
27-11-2008, 01:45 PM
I was there that night. I remember John and I turning to each other, pointing, and saying "Nah...can't be". :lol:

astronut
27-11-2008, 02:54 PM
I'm hopeful for the same sort of sky this weekend at the same site!!
I'm after "The Horsie" and Pease 1, a Planetary in M15 GC.
There are many other faint fuzzies that are on my list!!
Bring on the dark sky.:lol:

Mombat
27-11-2008, 06:49 PM
I remember back home i used to get what i would think of as class 2 and possibly class 1.
Where abouts where you in relation to berrima were you Astronut and Omaroo? I used to live in canyonleigh which is west of berrima on the other side of the Highway. Our property is about a 30 minute drive out from Moss Vale which would be the nearest town. It was all bush so the only clear area was about 2 acres we had cleared leaving the bottom 10- 20 degrees of the sky hidden.

Omaroo
27-11-2008, 07:16 PM
Mombat - Canyonleigh is about 10km from where our forest site is and on the same side of the Hume:

http://www.macastro.org.au/home/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=56&Itemid=83

Mombat
27-11-2008, 07:46 PM
Belanglo state forest i used to live i.e. when i was 1 or two in the house on the hill as you drive into the forest. The house with the really high pitched roof on the hill. From our house we can drive though the fire trails into belanglo.

Good skies there i still have to take my scope back home to take advantage of them all i got to use was an el cheapo 60mm refractor. But they are still some of the best views i have ever seen.

gary
27-11-2008, 08:21 PM
Hi Andrew,

As I have discussed on this forum before, Australia is pretty much one big
observing field. You have probably seen the satellite imagery showing the
globe at night. As it turns out, once you get away from the light pollution
'footprint' from towns and cities in Australia, it is pretty uniformly dark.
This is opposite to continents such as North America and Europe where it
is extremely difficult to find anywhere dark at all.

So in the end, it doesn't matter much whether you are in Lake Mungo, or
the Flinders Ranges, the Kimberley or the McDonnell Ranges or somewhere
on the road between Windorah and Birdsville, it is pretty much the same
when it comes to how dark it is, simply because the mean distance to the
nearest outdoor light bulb is a long way away.

In fact, what tends to differentiate one dark sky site from another in Australia
I find comes down to other attributes, such as the seeing and transparency
and general amenity and climate of the observing location.

For example, I would rather observe from the top of Mt. Kaputar, which is
a hop skip and a jump away from Narrabri, rather than observe from, say,
the West Macdonnell Ranges. The reason, you are at 1350m above sea
level on Mt. Kaputar and unlike the Macdonnell ranges or the Gibb River
Road in the Kimberley, you don't have two thousand flies crawling around your
eyes and corners of your mouth at 8pm as they try and steal every last
microgram of moisture they can find. :)

So you do indeed live in the lucky country. The types of dark skies that
those in other parts of the world can only ever read or dream about are
often less than a half day drive away from any major Australian city.

Pack the scope and get out and do it some time if you get the chance.

andrewk_82
28-11-2008, 09:24 AM
Thanks Gary,

I had a look and Mt Kaputar is less than a 3 hr drive from my place. I'll have to go there for a camping trip next chance I get. I'm surprised that such a good sight is so close to home. I thought I'd have to go to the middle of nowhere to get the skies described in that article.

Cheers

Paddy
28-11-2008, 12:24 PM
The best skies I have ever seen were long before my astronomical obsession, in the countryside of Tibet. I had and have never seen stars so bright and striking. I had seen plenty of very dark skies before over years of offshore sailing, but these dark mountainous skies were something else again!

mickkk
29-11-2008, 04:55 PM
King Island. About 9 houses and 50 people on the joint, 2 streetlights.

Well its not quite that backward, but it has the clearest skies Ive ever seen. Lying on your back and looking at the milky way is amazing. Was staring south once and saw about 2 shooting stars a minute.

The locals said that was pretty normal for there.

Theres not a lot to do at night, so if you like star gazing, head there!

ngcles
30-11-2008, 11:28 PM
Hi John & All,

John wrote:

"The most recent was in October 2007 at Coonabrabran when we experienced excellent conditions. I obtained regular repeatable readings of between 21.85 and 21.9 on my Unihedron Sky Quality Meter."

As a matter of interest, I was up at Mudgee (Gratti) for the last several days (only got one good night).

On that night (Sat 29112008) at 11.30pm I got readings on my SQM/L (my method is to take four readings, discard the first and average the following three) of 21.88, 21.90 & 21.90 making an average of 21.89. On this reading run it beeped between 12 and 13 times before readout (lots of beeps means lots of dark).

The "worst" averaged reading I got for the night was 21.84. The best single reading (not a first reading) was 21.91.

This equates to a ZLM of about 6.6. M33 was just visible naked eye. The Milky Way was incredibly detailed, marbled and dozens of O.Cs visible naked eye. At one stage I counted 14 stars in the area bounded by Betelgeuse, Bellatrix and the belt stars of Orion. It was a very, very good night -- I spent half of it gawking (slack-jawed and dribbling) naked-eye. I'd say it was a Bortle 1-2.

I love my SQM if only because it is totally objective provided it is used in accordance with the manufacturers instructions and people don't "gild the lily".

Best,

Les D

gary
04-12-2008, 03:16 PM
Hi Les,

Thanks for the post and sounds like you had a good night out.

One thing you do have to look out for is, as per the manufacturer's web site, that
these devices make no allowance for the Milky Way. Your "L" model has
a lens that restricts the FOV to around 10 degrees, which as you know is
still quite wide with our Milky Way infested skies at these latitudes.

One of the first things that strikes southern hemisphere observers when first arriving
at latitudes under northern hemisphere skies, is "where are all the stars?".

With the Milky Way often at the zenith here, when arriving at night at a place free of
all artificial light pollution and the glow of the Moon, often the first thing that strikes
you is that there is sufficient light from the Milky Way to set up the scope with
minimal or no requirement for a flashlight!

I suspect that an apples to apples comparison is often not going on when comparing
readings from these devices from locations in North America to locations in
Australia simply because of the Milky Way surface brightness.

We are indeed comparatively lucky down here.

Best regards

Gary

ausastronomer
04-12-2008, 03:28 PM
Hi Gary,

I have no doubt you are 100% correct with this assumption. I have had nights of outstanding observing conditions and still only obtained readings in the 21.5 to 21.7 range because of the Milky Way brightness. The sky quality on those nights correlated to higher readings than what could be obtained on the SQM. As you are probably aware my SQM is the older model which is more affected by Milky Way Glow than Les's newer model. You were at Coona the night I got those repeatable readings in the 21.85 to 21.9 range and you would have to agree they were outstanding observing conditions, which you don't encounter all that often.

Cheers,
John B

ngcles
05-12-2008, 11:05 PM
Hi Gary, John & All,

Yep we certainly do live in one of the best locations in the world to be an amateur observer and for a great many of us, only a couple of hrs drive is needed to reach an excellent or even pristine sky.

I remember the one night I observed with Steve Gottlieb from the U.S at my "nearly dark" site in the Southern Highlands not far from Bargo, he was blown away by how good it was just over an hour from the centre of Sydney. He felt it the equal of many sites they boast about in California, yet I've got the "hide" to label it "nearly dark".

Re the SQM readings from overseas, see:

http://www.unihedron.com/projects/darksky/database/index.php?statistics=true

There are several readings in the high 22s and even up to mid 23s that I am a little suspicious of ...

I wonder if these people were standing in the shade of a tree or maybe have fudged things ... just a wee bit ?

The night up at Mudgee last weekend (only 1 clear night) was up there with the best few I've seen from there. Haven't observed from Kaputar yet -- one day, it sounds a wonderful spot!

Best,

Les D

bmitchell82
06-12-2008, 12:38 AM
I used to live out on stations in the NT, one was 2.5hrs drive from darwin... and darwin on the LP map was only a speck. The memories of laying on the back of the tray of the truck looking up was phenomenal... too bad i didn't have my astronomy obsession then. I can agree with you that the milky way lights the place up. ahhh camping trips.

gary
09-12-2008, 01:09 PM
Hi Les,

Indeed.

What is always missing in these readings is any standard deviation.
For example, when someone reports that the reading was 22.00, that is
plus or minus what? Hopefully this appears in a spec somewhere and
would be interesting to know.

You only have to see some of the locales cited in those statistics to see something
is amiss.

Take Cherry Springs Pennsylvania. No doubt, by Pennslyvannia standards it might
well be dark. But for a location only 200km from Buffalo and the Great Lakes,
250km from Pittsburgh and 300km from New York city, it would hardly
be the first location that comes to mind for the world's darkest locations.
And yet, it reported as having some of the best SQM readings.

As many are aware, Coonabarabran is some 460km from Sydney but the
light dome from Sydney has become a problem for the professionals at the AAT.

Having been to New York city and Pittsburgh, these places are ablaze with light.
In fact, having flown from New York to San Francisco via Pittsburgh on a red eye
flight, there is one thing that startles me about the United States, which is that
Bill Gates could have been the richest man. When you look down from the plane,
you would reckon the guy that sold them all those orange street lights must
surely be the richest man in America. There are countless millions of them,
coast to coast across the continental U.S.

So having also been to places like Brendan has reported in the Northern Territory,
including flying over the interior of Australia at night, there is absolutely no
comparison.

Perhaps the organic material on the ground at the cattle stations in the Northern Territory
might be also used to describe these results? :)



With regards Kaputar, talk to the ranger in Narrabri with regards the key to
the track that goes to the helicopter/quarry area. This location has been cleared of trees.
Book one of the excellent value cabins.

glenc
19-12-2008, 09:19 AM
It is not dark here: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/12/18/1229189769741.html

robgreaves
19-12-2008, 10:24 AM
I built myself a large Tesla coil in the UK. I was generating a MegaVolt though with 30" long streamers. Awesome bit of kit.

Darkest skies I have seen was on an untra transparent, dark, new moon night out at Ayers Rock. The milky way cast a gentle shadown on the desert floor when you held your hand 12" above it.

Penrith night sky here though is just orange. Horrid.

Regards,
Rob

Wavytone
19-12-2008, 01:19 PM
I've experienced a few class 2 nights at Mt Kaputar during the early 1980's, once in the Nullarbor when observing Halleys Comet in 1986, and on one night earlier this year a site in the hills behind Bright, in the Victorian high country.

On the occasions at Kaputar there were quite a few experienced observers and to the naked eye most were easily seeing mag 7 - 7.5. The Milky Way in these conditions is just gorgeous, like tiny diamonds poured across a velvety deep blue sky. It is even more weird when you're FULLY dark adapted as you can see people and scopes and stuff on the ground - with no moon.

As you can camp on the top IMHO all serious stargrgazers should go to Kaputar at least once, even if only to have the chance to see how good the night sky can be.

I doubt there is anywhere in mainland Oz capable of being darker than Siding Spring mountain and Mt Kaputar. When the AAO site survey was done Kaputar finished second - it was similar for seeing and darkness and the only thing against it was more frequent cloud due to closer proximity to the coast.

PS -re the helicopter area in the forest on top of Kaputar - that area is about 100m along the Barraba fire trail and its the top of a lava field - it wasn't "cleared" - trees can't grow there as its harder than solid concrete !!

Paddy
19-12-2008, 01:51 PM
Hmmm.... I'm planning a trip with scope to the Warrumbungles next year. Might have to go little further and visit Mt Kaputar by the sounds of it!

PeterM
19-12-2008, 03:46 PM
Howdy,
I just posted a new thread under general discussion with a pic of participants taken at Kaputar in 86 or 87. In the 2 years I attended I saw some wonderful dark skies, some incredible storms and met some very keen amateurs.
PeterM

glenc
19-12-2008, 03:57 PM
I did some observing from Mt Surprise and Undara airports in Qld this year. Both places are very dark and have altitude too.
I also observed from Kaputar in 1986 and have observed from the Warrumbungles. In 1991 I observed from about 50km north of Meekatharra in WA, it was also very dark.

Terry B
19-12-2008, 04:04 PM
I've been to Kaputar many times but never at night with a scope. It is high and very dark up there but lots of trees. The roos are very friendly. They try to steal stuff off the BBQ and you have to chase them away.

pepperstone
19-12-2008, 04:12 PM
I was in Kitgum (near the border of Sudan and Uganda) earlier this year and that was pretty incredible. Of coure, I didn't have a telescope on me though. Amazing all the same.

gary
19-12-2008, 07:22 PM
Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the post.

I know exactly what you mean.

Mai and I have driven up through the desert just east of there, on the Kenyan side
close to the Sudan and Ethiopian frontiers in the Lake Turkana region.

It may well be the cradle of mankind and our collective ancestors probably spent
the first couple of million years there until we finally figured out the trick indeed was to
"bang the rocks together". It is pretty clear we didn't stick around there long enough to
invent the light bulb.

For example, you come across lone Turkana tribesmen standing naked in what, by any
definition, is the middle of nowhere in the desert, often carrying long spears or bows
and arrows.

The threat of marauding parties of Sudanese shifta in four wheel means that one
has to remain continually vigilant, so unfortunately an ideal picnic observing spot
it is not.

However, it may very well be the part of the world where we looked up
and for the first time, really contemplated the Moon and the stars.

Best Regards

Gary

Zuts
20-12-2008, 12:09 AM
I spent a year 30 km from Eungella in QLD. It is roughly 100 km west of Mackay and about 1000 m elevation. On a moonless cloudy night it was basically pitch black. As black as with your eyes shut.

On a fine night the sky was absolutely amazing :)

Cheers
Paul

gary
20-12-2008, 01:00 AM
Hi Paul,

You possibly mean around the highlands in the Broken River NP area, or maybe
west of there?

At lower elevations it is prone to fog and I have seen it get foggy all the way to the
top there at Broken River. I would imagine once you get a little further west
of there it appears to change from rain forest to drier open forest and would make for
a nice observing locale.

If you are in the rain forest down at Finch Haton at night and it is raining,
I can testify it is indeed dark.

However when it is clear it is very nice and I remember Andrew Murrell taking
some nice snaps of the night sky with the Nikon just hand held.

Best Regards

Gary

hector
20-12-2008, 11:57 AM
I have been to many Dark Sky sites in both Australia and the US. Mt Kaputar is a second darkest sky for me. The slight altitude helps seperate some of the dust from the atmosphere, so you are under a slightly more transparent sky. To prove to myself this is the case I had observed down at the Mt base then driven up to the top and again observed after letting myself dark adapt and it was better at the summit.
The darkest skies where from the middle of bumblef*** in South Australia near Glendambo. Gary, Mai, my wife and I were there to watch the Solar Eclipse and decided to camp the night just off the road near the rail line. I distinctly remember that the sky was DARK and Transparent. It had rained there only a few days before and the dust had been washed out of the sky.
The Sky at Ilford is good but Coona is much better. The TSP is held at one of the darkest spots in the US and even there the sky is in my opinion is no better than Ilford.
Andrew

gary
20-12-2008, 01:04 PM
Or as the Hitchhikers Guide would quote, "Mostly Harmless". :)

Andrew Murrell once had to transport a friend of ours back down the mountain
to the hospital in Narrabri for some stitches from a kangaroo that scratched her.

Apparently she had crouched down close to the animal to photograph it, which
she later realised was her mistake. When she went to stand back up, the roo
mistook her action as a threat and struck out at her, I believe slashing right through
her denim jeans into her leg, but Andrew would know all the gory details.

These days the road up and down the mountain is vastly improved compared
to the dusty, rough and dangerous track it was then. I certainly would
never like to have cause to go down it in a hurry.

Both patient and roo were fine, but it re-enforced the old actor's axiom to
avoid ever working with animals or young children. :)

Best Regards

Gary

gary
20-12-2008, 01:36 PM
Very memorable indeed and the best part of all was that we had all those
telescopes there, including your 20" Hector. We were very lucky with the
transparency and the rain that had threatened observing the eclipse earlier
assisted greatly.

It was about an hour's drive north of Woomera and about 2 and a half hours drive south
of Coober Pedy. With Adelaide 600km away there is absolutely zero light pollution.
I remember as we drove north of Port Augusta the cloud dissipated the further
inland we went until it was absolutely blue sky from horizon to horizon so we
had more luck than those who had committed themselves to Ceduna.

Some pictures of Hector set up there the day after the eclipse 4th Dec 2002 attached.

Best Regards

Gary

Zuts
20-12-2008, 01:47 PM
Hi Gary,

I was in a little farmhouse on the Crediton Loop, about a km or two from the Crediton Hall.

gary
20-12-2008, 02:04 PM
Hi Paul,

OK! I think I know approximately where you mean, possibly on the way out to the
dam there. Nice part of the world!

Best Regards

Gary