AnakChan
01-09-2014, 06:58 PM
Hi all,
I'm a new joiner to IceInSpace but not a noob to Astronomy; although I haven't been doing any for about 15 years. My history with scopes include a 4.5" Meade Newtonian, Meade DS-10, and 18 years ago Vixen VC200L/GP-DX from Claude/AEC when he used to deal with Vixen.
I've been living in Tokyo for the past 14.5 years and have hardly taken my VC200L/GP-DX out, although I did have the VC200L overhauled maybe 10 years ago by Vixen. Recently the Astronomy bug has hit again and I'm looking at "updating" my kit.
My criteria is something decent but yet portable/transportable in a small car. As you can guess, Tokyo is very bright and it'll mean driving out a couple of hours to get access to any decent dark skies. Top it off, I don't have a large car.
I've pretty much settled on the Vixen SXP mount since at 11kg it's still manageable and can handle a payload of up to 16kg. The question now is the scope. Admittedly I've hardly done any astrophography with my VC200L, I'd still like to keep the astrophotography option open. I also have a limited budget (therefore Tak's Mewlon 250, Epsilon-180, Vixen VSD100F3.8 are out of the question, new at least...2nd hand maybe dpending on price). At most, I'll be using the OTA for probably 80% viewing and 20% DS astrophotography.
There's an awesome deal going on at the moment with an SXP/VC200L package (not too sure why!? Discontinuing the VC200L?) which I think I'm 90% sure of putting my money in it. Having said that, since I'm updating my gear, I'm also seeing this as an opportunity of trying something new.
For no particular reason I've been looking at the AX103S, and even VMC260L (although size of the VMC260L into my car may be an issue). I already have some old VC200L parts such as the Reducer but I'm not married to it - should I move away from a VC200L scope, the VC200L specific accessories can go with it.
So, based on my criteria, the questions are :-
1) Has anyone used the two VC200L & AX103S and have any experience to share in their comparisons & contrast? I know we're coming very different tech of VISAC vs refractors but am keen to hear the differences about these two specific models nevertheless
2) If you were in my shoes whereby you've owned a VC200L for so long, would you consider switching just for experience or "stick to your guns"?
3) Any other thoughts for me to consider? Maybe the RSO 8" or 10"?
I should add what I like & don't like about the VC200L that may help in your advice to me :-
+ weight
+ compact
+ fast cooling
+ no primary mirror shift (i.e. not interested in Meade/Celestron SC's).
- low contrast
= thick vanes, so far hasn't bothered me, but may if I get into DS astrophotography more?
Sorry for this lengthy post. Hope I can get some thoughts from some of you.
I'm a new joiner to IceInSpace but not a noob to Astronomy; although I haven't been doing any for about 15 years. My history with scopes include a 4.5" Meade Newtonian, Meade DS-10, and 18 years ago Vixen VC200L/GP-DX from Claude/AEC when he used to deal with Vixen.
I've been living in Tokyo for the past 14.5 years and have hardly taken my VC200L/GP-DX out, although I did have the VC200L overhauled maybe 10 years ago by Vixen. Recently the Astronomy bug has hit again and I'm looking at "updating" my kit.
My criteria is something decent but yet portable/transportable in a small car. As you can guess, Tokyo is very bright and it'll mean driving out a couple of hours to get access to any decent dark skies. Top it off, I don't have a large car.
I've pretty much settled on the Vixen SXP mount since at 11kg it's still manageable and can handle a payload of up to 16kg. The question now is the scope. Admittedly I've hardly done any astrophography with my VC200L, I'd still like to keep the astrophotography option open. I also have a limited budget (therefore Tak's Mewlon 250, Epsilon-180, Vixen VSD100F3.8 are out of the question, new at least...2nd hand maybe dpending on price). At most, I'll be using the OTA for probably 80% viewing and 20% DS astrophotography.
There's an awesome deal going on at the moment with an SXP/VC200L package (not too sure why!? Discontinuing the VC200L?) which I think I'm 90% sure of putting my money in it. Having said that, since I'm updating my gear, I'm also seeing this as an opportunity of trying something new.
For no particular reason I've been looking at the AX103S, and even VMC260L (although size of the VMC260L into my car may be an issue). I already have some old VC200L parts such as the Reducer but I'm not married to it - should I move away from a VC200L scope, the VC200L specific accessories can go with it.
So, based on my criteria, the questions are :-
1) Has anyone used the two VC200L & AX103S and have any experience to share in their comparisons & contrast? I know we're coming very different tech of VISAC vs refractors but am keen to hear the differences about these two specific models nevertheless
2) If you were in my shoes whereby you've owned a VC200L for so long, would you consider switching just for experience or "stick to your guns"?
3) Any other thoughts for me to consider? Maybe the RSO 8" or 10"?
I should add what I like & don't like about the VC200L that may help in your advice to me :-
+ weight
+ compact
+ fast cooling
+ no primary mirror shift (i.e. not interested in Meade/Celestron SC's).
- low contrast
= thick vanes, so far hasn't bothered me, but may if I get into DS astrophotography more?
Sorry for this lengthy post. Hope I can get some thoughts from some of you.